Compare

Carelytic vs AlayaCare

Both are modern, cloud-based platforms — so the UI-generation gap that defines other comparisons isn't the story here. The real difference is depth on US Medicare home health PDGM, pricing transparency, and AI positioning.

The short answer. AlayaCare is a modern cloud platform with strong roots in home care, scheduling, and telehealth, used across multiple countries. Carelytic is purpose-built for US Medicare home health — OASIS-E2, CMS-485, the full PDGM pipeline — with published pricing and OIG-safe AI. If your priority is home care operations and telehealth across markets, AlayaCare is strong. If your priority is US home health PDGM depth with transparent pricing, look at Carelytic.

Side by side

Carelytic vs AlayaCare, feature by feature.

  Carelytic AlayaCare
Published pricing Yes — Starter / Pro / Enterprise listed on the site Quote-based, not published
Modern cloud platform Yes — built 2025-2026 Yes — modern cloud platform
US Medicare HH PDGM depth Core focus — 432 HHRGs, Grouper, LUPA, NOA, CY2026 data Supported — confirm depth for your needs
OASIS-E2 across 6 CMS timepoints Built in — all 10 sections Supported on the platform
AI for coding / QA OIG-safe, evidence-cited Coding Review AI and data-science tooling
Billing & EVV Included in every tier Available — confirm scope in your quote
Mobile clinician experience Installable PWA, offline outbox, voice dictation, signature canvas Mobile apps with established offline support
Passkey / WebAuthn login Built in — Touch ID / Face ID / hardware keys + trusted device Standard 2FA (publicly documented)

Comparison reflects publicly available product information as of 2026. AlayaCare updates its offering frequently — verify the current details in your own discovery process.

Where Carelytic wins

What you get with Carelytic that's hard to match.

Purpose-built for US home health PDGM

Carelytic's entire data model is US Medicare home health: 432 HHRGs with CY2026 weights, ~75K ICD-10 crosswalk codes, Grouper Preview, LUPA Risk, NOA Tracker, HIPPS-injected episode claims, OASIS-E2 across all six CMS timepoints. If Medicare home health is your core business, that depth is the difference.

Published pricing

Carelytic lists Starter / Professional / Enterprise pricing. AlayaCare pricing is quote-based. For a US agency that wants to budget before an evaluation, the published model is a real advantage.

OIG-safe AI positioning

Carelytic's AI Coding Review is explicitly engineered and marketed as compliance-safe — it cites chart evidence and never frames itself as reimbursement maximization. For US agencies watching OIG enforcement, that positioning matters.

Everything in every tier

Billing, EVV, PDGM, payroll, eligibility, fax, AI — all included on Starter. No module map. Confirm AlayaCare's scope-by-tier in your quote.

Passkeys + WebAuthn out of the box

Carelytic ships WebAuthn / passkey login — Touch ID, Face ID, Windows Hello, hardware keys — plus a trusted-device second factor and offline chart drafts encrypted with WebCrypto. Most home health platforms still rely on TOTP-on-every-login. That gap matters as more agencies treat clinical software as a real security surface.

Why agencies switch

Signs it's time to look at Carelytic.

Most agencies don't switch platforms casually — it's a real project. These are the triggers we hear most often from agencies that moved off AlayaCare.

Book a demo
  • Your core business is US Medicare home health and you want PDGM depth, not breadth across markets.
  • You want published pricing instead of a quote-based evaluation.
  • You want AI positioned as compliance-safe for the US OIG enforcement environment.
  • You want every billing, EVV, and PDGM capability included rather than scoped by tier.

Carelytic vs AlayaCare — FAQ

Straight answers to the questions buyers ask.

Carelytic vs AlayaCare — which is more modern?

Both are modern, cloud-based platforms, so this isn't a legacy-vs-modern comparison. The meaningful differences are focus and transparency: Carelytic is purpose-built for US Medicare home health PDGM with published pricing and OIG-safe AI, while AlayaCare has strong roots in home care, scheduling, and telehealth across multiple markets.

Is Carelytic better for US Medicare home health than AlayaCare?

For agencies whose core business is US Medicare home health, Carelytic's depth is built specifically for that: 432 HHRGs with CY2026 weights, Grouper Preview, LUPA Risk, NOA Tracker, HIPPS-injected episode claims, and OASIS-E2 across all six CMS timepoints. AlayaCare supports home health but its strengths also span home care and telehealth — evaluate based on what your core business is.

Does AlayaCare or Carelytic publish pricing?

Carelytic publishes its pricing: Starter $350/mo, Professional $999/mo, Enterprise from $2,499/mo. AlayaCare pricing is quote-based and not published, so a direct comparison requires a quote scoped to your agency.

Keep comparing

See how Carelytic stacks up against other platforms.

Carelytic vs Axxess

Both run a home health agency end to end. The real difference is pricing transparency, whether core modules are...

Read the comparison

Carelytic vs WellSky

WellSky is a broad healthcare technology company spanning many care settings. Carelytic is purpose-built for US home...

Read the comparison

Carelytic vs HomeCare HomeBase

HomeCare HomeBase is built for large, enterprise-scale home health and hospice organizations. Carelytic is built for...

Read the comparison

Carelytic vs MatrixCare

MatrixCare covers skilled nursing, senior living, hospice, and home health under one vendor — broad, enterprise,...

Read the comparison

Carelytic vs KanTime

KanTime covers home health, hospice, pediatric, and private duty — broad across care lines, established in...

Read the comparison

Carelytic vs Alora

Both target mid-market home health agencies. The honest differences come down to pricing transparency, the mobile /...

Read the comparison